TY - JOUR
T1 - Simulation-Based Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshops
T2 - A Reproducible Model for Sustainable Education
AU - Kantar, Rami S.
AU - Breugem, Corstiaan C.
AU - Keith, Kristen
AU - Kassam, Serena
AU - Vijayakumar, Charanya
AU - Bow, Mikaela
AU - Alfonso, Allyson R.
AU - Chahine, Elsa M.
AU - Ghotmi, Lilian H.
AU - Patel, Krishna G.
AU - Shetye, Pradip R.
AU - Santiago, Pedro E.
AU - Losee, Joseph E.
AU - Steinbacher, Derek M.
AU - Rossell-Perry, Percy
AU - Garib, Daniela G.
AU - Alonso, Nivaldo
AU - Mann, Robert J.
AU - Prada-Madrid, Jose Rolando
AU - Esenlik, Elçin
AU - Pamplona, María del Carmen
AU - Collares, Marcus Vinícius Martins
AU - Bennun, Ricardo D.
AU - Kummer, Ann
AU - Giugliano, Carlos
AU - Padwa, Bonnie L.
AU - Raposo-Amaral, Cassio Eduardo
AU - Tse, Raymond
AU - Sommerlad, Brian
AU - Flores, Roberto L.
AU - Hamdan, Usama S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. All rights reserved 2020.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Objective: Evaluate simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops as a reproducible model for education with sustained impact. Design: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. Setting: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Participants: Total of 180 participants. Interventions: Three-day simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Main Outcome Measures: Number of workshop participants stratified by specialty, satisfaction with the workshop, satisfaction with simulation-based workshops as educational tools, impact on cleft surgery procedural confidence, short-term impact on clinical practice, medium-term impact on clinical practice. Results: The workshop included 180 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 54.5%, with participants reporting high satisfaction with all aspects of the workshop and with simulation-based workshops as educational tools. Participants reported a significant improvement in cleft lip (33.3 ± 5.7 vs 25.7 ± 7.6; P '.001) and palate (32.4 ± 7.1 vs 23.7 ± 6.6; P '.001) surgery procedural confidence following the simulation sessions. Participants also reported a positive short-term and medium-term impact on their clinical practices. Conclusion: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops are well received by participants, lead to improved cleft surgery procedural confidence, and have a sustained positive impact on participants’ clinical practices. Future efforts should focus on evaluating and quantifying this perceived positive impact, as well reproducing these efforts in other areas of need.
AB - Objective: Evaluate simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops as a reproducible model for education with sustained impact. Design: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. Setting: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Participants: Total of 180 participants. Interventions: Three-day simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Main Outcome Measures: Number of workshop participants stratified by specialty, satisfaction with the workshop, satisfaction with simulation-based workshops as educational tools, impact on cleft surgery procedural confidence, short-term impact on clinical practice, medium-term impact on clinical practice. Results: The workshop included 180 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 54.5%, with participants reporting high satisfaction with all aspects of the workshop and with simulation-based workshops as educational tools. Participants reported a significant improvement in cleft lip (33.3 ± 5.7 vs 25.7 ± 7.6; P '.001) and palate (32.4 ± 7.1 vs 23.7 ± 6.6; P '.001) surgery procedural confidence following the simulation sessions. Participants also reported a positive short-term and medium-term impact on their clinical practices. Conclusion: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops are well received by participants, lead to improved cleft surgery procedural confidence, and have a sustained positive impact on participants’ clinical practices. Future efforts should focus on evaluating and quantifying this perceived positive impact, as well reproducing these efforts in other areas of need.
KW - ethics/health policies
KW - lip form
KW - lip function
KW - oral health
KW - palatoplasty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088813352&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1055665620944781
DO - 10.1177/1055665620944781
M3 - Article
C2 - 32729337
AN - SCOPUS:85088813352
SN - 1055-6656
VL - 57
SP - 1238
EP - 1246
JO - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
JF - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
IS - 10
ER -